Abstract

This conceptual paper discusses the phenomenon of differentiation made possible through branding or innovation or a combination of the two. Differentiation is eventually the driving force for the development of its own negation, commoditization. When customers have endured a commoditized market long enough the opportunities open up for creative destruction, this concept of Schumpeter (1942), means that an entrepreneur invents a completely new way of satisfying the customers’ unsatisfied needs, making the industry that no longer bothered about their customers. Many researchers have tried to re/brand destructive innovation as their own, with concepts, such as of ”transilience”, and “blue ocean strategy’, as opposed to ‘red ocean strategy’.
 The paper focuses on innovation as a differentiation strategy and on temporary monopoly rent as a driver of innovation. Increased competition and shortening and life cycles makes capitalism more volatile and the strategies to reduce the risks involved are discussed. These strategies lead to the real-world implementation of the concentration of capital forecasted by Marx and feared by Schumpeter.
 The paper identifies the need to continuously monitor the concentration of capital and to understand individual markets by studying the firm’s profit.

Highlights

  • The “market” concept is central in marketing, but we are often sloppy in defining it and explain the mechanisms regulating markets

  • Under the header Commoditization and creative destruction, we show how markets mature from competition and enter into a phase of slow change that eventually ends in what is called Creative destruction, when the industry is over-run by a newly arising industry

  • Classical economics (Smith, 1776/982; Malthus, 1798/1970; Ricardo, 1817/1971; Marx 1894/1970; and others) understood that there is a drive among capitalists to get more than the average profit. They recognized this as monopoly rent, a premium for being different, which meant that profits were re-distributed in the marketplace to the advantage of the company with a unique, and especially the most unique product

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The “market” concept is central in marketing, but we are often sloppy in defining it and explain the mechanisms regulating markets. Different traditions in marketing rely on different perspectives on how to view the market and the mechanisms regulating it. Under Competition and differentiation we discuss how competition forces companies in general to differentiate their products and services, to reach higher profits. Under Innovation and Monopoly Rent, we discuss the extra-ordinary profit levels that can be achieved by successful radical innovation. Most needs are different for different customers, if we address these specific needs, we produce products and services which are differentiated, heterogeneous. Differentiation means that the product satisfies the need differently, through innovation, or better, because of quality. The firm that manages to produce such added value and communicate the extra value to customers reap higher profits in the marketplace

Winemaking in France
Competition and differentiation
Two elements of differentiation
Innovation and Monopoly Rent
Volatility risks and the management of these
The concentration of capital
Commoditization and creative destruction
Sustainable creative destruction
10. Conclusions and research proposals
Findings
11. References

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.