Abstract

In 2009, the Australian federal government used the projected rise in aged care expenditure and changing societal attitudes to justify the decision to overhaul the funding for aged healthcare services. A major feature of the reforms was the introduction of a consumer directed care (CDC) model. This followed the UK, Sweden, Canada and the USA who had already implemented CDC to some degree. The CDC model transferred aged care decisions from providers to consumers. This promised to create a competitive market system, resulting in decreased costs, increased quality and increased consumer satisfaction of aged healthcare services. Advocacy services were also reformed to address market failures. These changes were achieved by engaging key actors throughout the policy cycle, giving perceived legitimacy and transparency; and commissioning reviews with restricted scope and at calculated times, limiting their ability to produce negative criticism. In July 2018, the federal government gained full funding and responsibility for aged care with the support of key stakeholders and multiple reviews, yet with little objective data on the benefit of the reforms. This analysis highlights the power of the policymaking process in creating policies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call