Abstract

This study investigated consumer knowledge and attitude toward environmental sustainability, grain-free diets (GFDs), and the influence of on-site environmental sustainability education on pet owner diet choices. A two-part questionnaire was designed, bracketing an educational brochure on environmental sustainability and GFDs. The study consisted of an informational brochure and two questionnaire sections, Q1 and Q2. Preliminary information regarding current diets, diet choice(s), views of environmental sustainability, the definition of GFDs, and the likelihood of feeding GFDs were gathered via Q1. Participants then read a factual brochure regarding pet food trends and environmental sustainability. After reading the brochure, participants completed Q2. Pet ownership of the survey population indicated 12/78 cared exclusively for at least one cat, 48/78 cared exclusively for at least one dog, and 18 cared exclusively for at least one dog and one cat. The majority (70/78) of survey responders fed a dry commercial product, 25/78 fed a canned commercial product, and 1/78 fed a commercial raw product. Prior to reading the brochure, 44.9% of participants were able to partially identify a GFD, 47.4% partially defined environmental sustainability, and 19.2% reported feeding a GFD. After reading the brochure, 67.6% of participants were able to identify a more environmentally sustainable diet vs. 55.9% prior to reading the brochure. A paired T-test demonstrated that after reading the brochure, people were significantly less likely to feed a GFD (p < 0.001). When participants already feeding a GFD were isolated, they demonstrated a higher likelihood to feed a GFD both before and after reading the pamphlet than the remaining population; however, the likelihood decreased from 8.4 ± 2.7 to 7.8 ± 2.7. The informational brochure was effective; participants were less likely to feed a GFD after reading the brochure. Although participants considered environmental sustainability important, factors independent of environmental sustainability influenced the likelihood of diet change. Participants already feeding a GFD also ranked environmental sustainability highly but were less likely to consider changing their pet's diet. These preliminary findings identify a need for public education regarding pet food choices that can have environmental consequences.

Highlights

  • In recent decades, anthropomorphism of domestic animals has led to an increased inclusion into family units such that they are viewed as family members [1]

  • Least important factors influencing pet food selection were packaging (2.6%), environmental sustainability (14.1%), and both a grain-free diets (GFDs) and a diet that is free of corn wheat and soy (16.7%)

  • Feeding based on dietary trends that are in direct competition with environmental sustainability such as human grade, natural, ancestral, raw, homemade, and grain-free have become increasingly popular for reasons not well researched in peer reviewed literature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anthropomorphism of domestic animals has led to an increased inclusion into family units such that they are viewed as family members [1]. The pet product industry and pet food manufacturers have responded to this culture shift with trendy diets that questionably align with animal health, nutritional biochemistry, and physiology [4, 5] These diet trends include grain free, homemade and utilization of “human grade” ingredients. The most well-known and best advertised among these are the grain-free diet (GFD) trend in which pet food companies market these diets as high protein “ancestral diets” that are healthier than their grain inclusive counterparts These trends challenge the concept of environmental sustainability (ES) by promoting excessive intake of animal based protein feed ingredients, by the over use of “human grade” ingredients that compete directly with the human food system and by discouraging the use of more sustainable ingredients in pet food such as grains and by-products [6]. These factors can all be quite impactful on the environment as supported by Okin et al who reported that dog and cat animal product consumption is responsible for the release of up to 64 ± 16 million tons of CO2-equivalent methane and nitrous oxide, two powerful greenhouse gasses [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call