Abstract
Plain english summaryMyalgic encephalitis (M.E.) is a common condition, the cause of which is not known and there are no treatments available. In this study the national patient support group Action for M.E. sought the opinions of their members via an online survey as to what they felt should be future priorities for M.E. research.Respondents were asked what they considered first, second and third research priorities to be from a list of 13 pre-defined options. Individuals were invited to provide additional free text comments about Action for M.E.’s research priorities in general.Of the 1144 respondents: 822 had M.E.; 94 were a supporting a member of Action for M.E. ; 66 were carers for someone with M.E.; 26 were professionals with an interest in M.E.; 136 had a family member or colleague with M.E. Individuals selected more than one category as applicable.The top five research priorities identified were: disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the causes of M.E.; more effective treatments; faster and more accurate diagnosis; clinical course of M.E.; outcomes and natural history; and severely affected patients. Least popular priorities were: sleep; economic research towards identifying the cost of ME; and psychological aspects. Much of the free text comments emphasised the importance of funding biomedical research into disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the causes of M.E. Three themes were identified in relation to this topic: accurate diagnosis and awareness; risk factors and causes; drug development and curative therapies.In conclusion; individuals affected by M.E. have clear views regarding priorities for research investment. These have informed Action for M.E.’s ongoing research strategy and ultimately will inform national and international research priorities.
Highlights
The aim of this work was to involve patients in setting future priorities for myalgic encephalomyelitis (M.E.) research
Participants were asked what they considered Action for M.E.’s first, second and third research priorities should be from a list of 13 pre-defined options
Top five research priorities described by Action for M.E. survey respondents The top five areas identified as a first, second or third research priority were: disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the underlying pathology of M.E.; more effective treatments; faster and more accurate diagnosis; clinical course of M.E., outcomes and prognosis; and severely affected patients
Summary
The aim of this work was to involve patients in setting future priorities for myalgic encephalomyelitis (M.E.) research. Much of the unstructured data provided by respondents emphasised the importance of funding biomedical research into disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the underlying pathology of M.E. Three themes were identified in relation to this topic: accurate diagnosis and awareness; risk factors and causes; drug development and curative therapies. Conclusions: Individuals affected by M.E. have clear views regarding the most important priorities for research investment These tended to focus on disease processes to achieve a better understanding of the underlying pathology of M.E. and have been used to inform Action for M.E.’s ongoing research strategy. Involving patients in setting the research agenda is important as their priorities may differ from current research practice, and are more likely to reflect the interests of the NHS, public health and social care services [15]. In keeping with the core democratic principles of active citizenship, accountability and transparency, the legitimacy and sustainability of investment decisions made by research funding bodies will be increasingly influenced by how well they reflect the underlying values of the general public [16]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
