Abstract

CONTEXTThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of consultations received by an otolaryngology service at a 772-bed large metropolitan, MI-based hospital.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of the specific types of consultations received during calendar year 2016.RESULTSA total of 518 consultations were reviewed and analyzed by the first and second authors (MM, CB). Consultations with low intervention rates included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) (32.3%), dysphonia (difficulty speaking) (16%), otalgia (earache) (20.8%), hearing loss (13.3%), rule out vocal cord dysfunction (0%), and vertigo/dizziness (0%). Epistaxis (nosebleed) was the most frequent reason for consultations, and angioedema (lip or airway swelling) was the most common airway-related consultation. Notably, emergent or urgent surgery was only performed on 4.6% of sample patients. Several common consultation reasons (e.g., longer-term hearing loss evaluation and cerumen (“earwax”) removal) could have been deferred for clinic-based evaluation where audiograms and microscopes are more readily available.CONCLUSIONSThese findings suggest areas for continuing education for primary care provider and resident education to place more appropriate hospital consultations. Annual resident lectures to prepare junior residents for the most common call scenarios (i.e., control epistaxis and incision and drainage of peritonsillar abscesses) could be helpful in this area. In addition, didactic lectures for primary care physicians on how to evaluate patients with dysphagia may be of value as this was a common consult for otolaryngologist referrals.

Highlights

  • Hospital and emergency department (ED) consultations for otolaryngology (i.e., Ear, Nose, and Throat or “ENT”) services span a wide range of patient complaints with varying degrees of severity and urgency

  • With rising healthcare costs, increased pressures to obtain higher patient satisfaction scores, and resident hour restrictions, the need to examine this phenomenon of the ENT service hospital consultations to increase healthcare efficiency and maintain patient safety has been emphasized.[1,2,3]

  • The aim of this study was to identify trends in ED and hospital ENT consultations as it pertained to intervention rates, ENT sign off rates, and the types of intervention performed by ENT service providers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to identify trends in ED and hospital ENT consultations as it pertained to intervention rates, ENT sign off rates, and the types of intervention performed by ENT service providers. Identifying such trends could help foster possible areas of education for lesser-experienced residents and other consulting services. Examining possible instances of such trends at a larger 772-bed metropolitan hospital (i.e. especially those conditions requiring little ENT intervention) could serve to identify areas where efficiency and potentially cost savings can be increased within similar healthcare systems

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call