Abstract

The purpose of this study was to research and understand the interrelations between the growth of gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), the volume of construction industry, supply of interindustry balance, and amount of fixed-asset investments in Russia between 2000 and 2016. The autoregressive distributed-lagged (ARDL) bound testing methodology and regression analysis were applied to evaluate the cointegration and influence of construction industry volume on gross fixed-capital formation. Empirical studies on the role of the construction industry are at the forefront of economic research; however, ARDL modeling studies of GFCF have yet to be conducted in Russia. The study revealed a non-linear causation between construction industry volume and the growth in GFCF over a long time period. The correlation was stationary and cointegrated. Fixed investment positively affected gross fixed capital formation only in periods of economic expansion, whereas the effectiveness of fixed-asset investments had greater volatility in times of crisis. The construction industry was not practically affected by crisis shocks, demonstrating a permanent stationarity in the causal relationship with GFCF, whereas causal relations between GFCF and the supply of interindustry balance were absent. The results are important for further research in the field of economic growth, the development of a national budget and investment policy, as well as investment project selection.

Highlights

  • Since the early 2000s, the Russian economy has grown considerably

  • We turned to the gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) and RC statistics as a sequence of observations of the defined variables at a uniform interval over a period of time in successive order to identify the relationship between GFCF and RC

  • The results showed that the economic times-series data GFCF(RC,in fixed capital (IC)) possessed unique features such as a clear trend and a high degree of persistence after shocks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Other observations include the downturn in 2013 when GDP contracted by 7.29%; in 2015, it contracted by 1.07%; and in 2018, by 1.34% (Kudrin and Gurvich 2014). Since 2000, various national reforms (social, infrastructural, military, agricultural, management, etc.) have been implemented in Russia (Kudrin and Sokolov 2017). One of the major purposes of this study was to identify the role and measure the influence of the construction industry on the gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), as the construction industry in Russia is developing with the strong financial support of the government. GFCF is applied to measure the value of fixed assets excluding amortized costs (Sarmento 2018) and represents the increase in the tangible and intangible assets produced. The GFCF measures the value of new or existing fixed asset acquisitions of government, business, and private households

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call