Abstract

Construction project schedule delay is a worldwide concern and especially severe in the Ethiopian construction industry. This study developed a Construction Schedule Risk Assessment Model (CSRAM) and a management strategy for foreign general contractors (FGCs). 94 construction projects with schedule delay were collected and a questionnaire survey of 75 domain experts was conducted to systematically select 22 risk factors. In CSRAM, the artificial neural network (ANN) inference model was developed to predict the project schedule delay. Integrating it with the Garson algorithm (GA), the relative weights of risk factors with rankings were calculated and identified. For comparison, the Relative Importance Index (RII) method was also applied to rank the risk factors. Management strategies were developed to improve the three highest-ranked factors identified using the GA (change order, corruption/bribery, and delay in payment), and the RII (poor resource management, corruption/bribery, and delay in material delivery). Moreover, the improvement results were used as inputs for the trained ANN to conduct a sensitivity analysis. The findings of this study indicate that improvements in the factors that considerably affect the construction schedule can significantly reduce construction schedule delays. This study acts as an important reference for FGCs who plan to enter or work in the Ethiopian construction industry.

Highlights

  • Summarizing the issues discussed above, the main purpose of this research was to develop an integrated approach, the Construction Schedule Risk Assessment Model (CSRAM), which would reduce to a minimum the subjective judgement made by experts in risk factor identification; concurrently, the interactive relationships of these factors in the analysis process were considered in order to enhance the consistency of factor ranking

  • The analysis results validate whether the Garson algorithm (GA) or Relative Importance Index (RII) is more accurate in indicating the risk factors that have strong influences on construction schedule delays in Ethiopian construction projects

  • The schedule delay obtained from the 10% improvement of the top-ranked risk factors in the GA analysis was lower than that obtained from the 40% improvement in the top three ranked risk factors in the RII analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Due to the subjective judgements of the experts, the identified factors varied from among the different research outcomes These inconsistent findings have caused project managers some difficulties in determining the right factors to consider for schedule delay reduction. Identifying and including the interactive relationships of the factors in the analysis for priority ranking will be the main concern to efficiently and significantly improve the schedule delay. Summarizing the issues discussed above, the main purpose of this research was to develop an integrated approach, the CSRAM, which would reduce to a minimum the subjective judgement made by experts in risk factor identification; concurrently, the interactive relationships of these factors in the analysis process were considered in order to enhance the consistency of factor ranking. The CSRAM includes three phases of analysis: risk factor selection and database development, factor ranking using AI, and comparison and sensitivity analysis for validation

Risk Factor Selection and Database Development
Factor Ranking Using AI
Comparison and Sensitivity Analysis for Validation
Literature Review
Identify the Risk Factors That Cause Schedule Delay
Data Collection and Establishment of the Initial Database
Construction methods
Computing the RWs of Risk Factors Using GA
Determining the RII of Risk Factors
Development of Management Strategies
Sensitivity Analysis
Model Implementation
Calculation of the RWs of the Selected Risk Factors by Using the GA
Calculation of the RII of the Selected Risk Factors
Develop Management Strategies for Improving the Top Three Ranked Risk Factors
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.