Abstract

SummarySeveral theorists who have analysed education on the micro-level have illustrated how mutual relations and process interpretation influence the education results. Furthermore, these authors show why relations are more beneficial to some pupils than to others. However, explanations why some pupils tend to benefit more are still simplistic, addressing only some of involved agents. This paper analyses how pupil identities in school are constructed. A teacher – one of the agents involved in the education process – holds the power to control the education process of pupils. Additionally, he has power to reinterpret the identities of other involved agents. However, although a teacher has power to state pupil connections to school, a pupil has power not to accept or follow the teacher’s definitions. In this paper, I show how these two agents interpret pupil’s identity and how differences in the interpretation occur. I approach identity construction at school from the perspective of three involved agents – pupils,teachers, and classmates. I analyse the text of 34 interviews with teachers and pupils. The analysis is structured so that it could represent three important agents that can influence identity construction, i. e. teachers, pupils, and classmates. I conclude that there are differences how pupil identity is influenced by the mentioned agents.Key words: school, identities, education nbsp;

Highlights

  • When we analyse and try to explain education, usually the first distinction we make is between teachers and pupils

  • This simple distinction allows us to grasp the main characteristics of education structure – some expert giving knowledge to persons who have to study to be prepared for their future existence in society

  • This simple distinction can be useful when talking about some idealized form of education or when we speak about education in general

Read more

Summary

Mikelis Grivins

Several theorists who have analysed education on the micro-level have illustrated how mutual relations and process interpretation influence the education results. I approach identity construction at school from the perspective of three involved agents – pupils, teachers, and classmates. When we analyse and try to explain education, usually the first distinction we make is between teachers and pupils This simple distinction allows us to grasp the main characteristics of education structure – some expert giving knowledge to persons who have to study to be prepared for their future existence in society. This article shows how pupil identities emerge as a result of mutual involved agent negotiations Such an approach could be considered novel for sociological education research in Latvia and for sociological education research in general. This paper is novel because in general there is a lack of researches addressing micro-level education processes and trying to simultaneously grasp the interpretations of all involved agents. This perspective suggests that our knowledge is constructed through text

Pupil identity at school
Teacher power
Identity negotiation
Data gathering and analysis
Discussion
Mokiniųidentitetokonstr av imasmokykloje Mikelis Grivins
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.