Abstract

Oral cancer develops and progresses by accumulation of genetic alterations. The interrelationship between these alterations and their sequence of occurrence in oral cancers has not been thoroughly understood. In the present study, we applied oncogenetic tree models to comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data of 97 primary oral cancers to identify pathways of progression. CGH revealed the most frequent gains on chromosomes 8q (72.4%) and 9q (41.2%) and frequent losses on 3p (49.5%) and 8p (47.5%). Both mixture and distance-based tree models suggested multiple progression pathways and identified +8q as an early event. The mixture model suggested two independent pathways namely a major pathway with -8p and a less frequent pathway with +9q. The distance-based tree identified three progression pathways, one characterized by -8p, another by -3p and the third by alterations +11q and +7p. Differences were observed in cytogenetic pathways of node-positive and node-negative oral cancers. Node-positive cancers were characterized by more non-random aberrations (n = 11) and progressed via -8p or -3p. On the other hand, node-negative cancers involved fewer non-random alterations (n = 6) and progressed along -3p. In summary, the tree models for oral cancers provided novel information about the interactions between genetic alterations and predicted their probable order of occurrence.

Highlights

  • Oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC), like all solid tumours, are characterized by multiple chromosomal alterations and are genetically complex[1]

  • Dependencies between the numerous genetic alterations lead to observed karyotypic complexity which results in the distinct

  • A brief statement about novelty of the research work: By applying oncogenetic tree models to the comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) data of oral cancers, we identified the sequence of alterations and the divergent pathways of progression

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC), like all solid tumours, are characterized by multiple chromosomal alterations and are genetically complex[1]. Dependencies between the numerous genetic alterations lead to observed karyotypic complexity which results in the distinct biological behaviour of oral cancers[2]. Node-positive OSCC are biologically aggressive and have poor prognosis as compared to the node-negative OSCC3. This indicates that different genetic pathways of progression exist in oral cancers, leading to the molecular subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes. It is necessary to identify the genetic alterations and the interactions between them that form multiple progression pathways. This approach may aid in better understanding the biology of oral carcinomas

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call