Abstract
In this paper, the green development evaluation system and method which is useful in power grid were studied and established, and the indicators that affect the green development process of the power grid were analyzed and classified. In order to reflect the comprehensive indicators of the assessment indicators and their impact on the whole society, the system also includes indirect indicators of power generation enterprises, government and social organizations as the main body of implementation, as the expansion of the power grid’s green development. In the calculation period, the TOPSIS method was introduced for evaluating the results and indicators of different companies in two provinces. This research will provide an important reference for energy companies to improve the internal assessment methods for environmental protection and green development.
Highlights
Since the 1980s, many countries, international organizations, and relevant UN departments have begun to publish their own environmental reporting guidelines, which stipulate environmental performance evaluation standards[1]
There are four common environmental performance evaluation standards in the world, namely the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' Environmental Performance Report, the ISO 14031 evaluation standard[2], the eco-efficiency indicator proposed by the World Enterprise Sustainable Development Committee, and the Sustainability Reporting Guide
Considering China's special energy pattern, future energy companies will lead the green development path in the energy field. They need to consider from the aspects of strategic objectives, development methods, and industrial development: (1) Based on national conditions and the trend of world energy reform, determine the promotion of their own, industry and (2) Actively promote its own green development and transform the development mode of the power grid; (3) Actively promote the green development of industry and society, and promote the formation of a green power production chain, consumer chain and equipment chain
Summary
Since the 1980s, many countries, international organizations, and relevant UN departments have begun to publish their own environmental reporting guidelines, which stipulate environmental performance evaluation standards[1]. There are four common environmental performance evaluation standards in the world, namely the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' Environmental Performance Report, the ISO 14031 evaluation standard[2], the eco-efficiency indicator proposed by the World Enterprise Sustainable Development Committee, and the Sustainability Reporting Guide. The evaluation methods applicable to China's policy environment and energy development process are still in a state of vacancy. It is necessary to establish a new indicator system to evaluate the green development status of provincial power grid companies
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
