Abstract

The Eastern part of the Miocene Zărand extensional basin witnessed the generation and evolution of the largest composite volcano in Apuseni Mts., named recently Bontău. The volcano is filling the basin at the junction between the South and North Apuseni Mountains. The Bontău Volcano is known to be active roughly between ~14–10. In spite of heavily forested and poorly exposed volcanic deposits, it was possible to identify its complex evolution. The volcano suggests an original oval-shaped edifice base currently showing a north-oriented horseshoe-shaped debris avalanche eroded crater. The early effusive volcanic activity was contemporaneous with the emplacement of individual and/or clustered volcanic lava Domes. Late-stage summit dome generation was followed by several volcanic collapses all around the volcanic edifice producing large volcanic debris avalanche deposits (DADs), accompanied by numerous debris flows all around the volcano periphery. Thick pumice pyroclastic flow deposits found below DADs at the periphery may suggest that the slope failures were proceeded by a Plinian eruption. The debris avalanche crater is the last event in the volcano evolution exposing several intrusive andesitic-dioritic bodies and associated hydrothermal and mineralization processes, most probably including the former central vent area of the volcano. The volcano proximal effusive and explosive deposits display a change in the composition of the erupting magma (increased SiO2 from 53.4% to 60.6%) that resulted in an increase of viscosity and the construction of the summit lava domes. Such domes are however only found as various size blocks in DADs. The volcanism connects with the two steps of geotectonic evolution of the Zărand Basin: The initial construction period during regional extension started ~16 Ma up to 12.3–12.1 when the Bontău volcano and surrounding domes were generated. The second period, younger than 12 Ma, corresponds to NW-SE compressional tectonics developed only in the Bontău volcano with summit dome generation and, finally, assists volcano destruction and DADs generation. Newly performed geochemical and Sr and Nd isotopic data studies attest to a calc-alkaline character and suggest an evolution via assimilation-fractional crystallization processes of a dominant MORB-like mantle source magma. Also, they confirm the amphibole (±pyroxene) andesites to be the most evolved lithology. The stepwise changes in fracture propagation in the Zărand extensional setting along with a change to more hydrated and fractionated magma favored in ~4 Myrs of the evolution of the Bontău volcano lead to multiple pulses of the longest-lived magma chamber in the whole Miocene volcanism of the Apuseni Mts.

Highlights

  • This study is dedicated to the Bontău volcanic complex, the major known andesitic composite volcano (e.g., [1]) and associated lava Dome structures that were rising inside the largest graben system in the southern part of the Apuseni Mts. during Middle-Late

  • The andesitic Bontău volcano consists of two N–S–oriented remnants of the largest andesitic stratovolcano in the Zărand basin as initiated at ~14 Ma and ended at

  • The second stage, after ~12 Ma started with a Plinian eruption and continued with extrusive dome generation further associated with gravitational collapses, emplacing massive debris avalanche deposits (DADs), widely distributed all around the volcano

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study is dedicated to the Bontău volcanic complex, the major known andesitic composite volcano (e.g., [1]) and associated lava Dome structures that were rising inside the largest graben system in the southern part of the Apuseni Mts. during Middle-Late. Transnationally as Békés-Zărand basin, Mts. or nationally as Zărand basin the largestknown graben system in the southern part of the Apuseni during Middle-Late (e.g., [2,3]; Figure 1). Recent field data acquisition along with additional rock have. Known transnationally as Békés-Zărand basin, or nationally as Zărandsampling basin led to a novel volcanological and petrological interpretation.

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call