Abstract

We have constructed three bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries of wheat cultivar Triticum aestivum Wangshuibai, germplasms T. monococcum TA2026 and TA2033. A total of 1,233,792,170,880 and 263,040 clones were picked and arrayed in 384-well plates. On the basis of genome sizes of 16.8 Gb for hexaploid wheat and 5.6 Gb for diploid wheat, the three libraries represented 9.05-, 2.60-, and 3.71-fold coverage of the haploid genomes, respectively. An improved descending pooling system for BAC libraries screening was established. This improved strategy can save 80% of the time and 68% of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the same successful rate as the universal 6D pooling strategy.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe lack of a complete genome sequence limits the research available of the wheat genome

  • Wheat is one of the most important food crops in the world [1]

  • The transformation efficiencies of the 3-day ligation reactions with 1.5–5.1 × 105/μg DNA were 6.8–9.2 times higher than the efficiency of 1-day ligation (Table 1) and 1.5 to 5 times higher than the 1 × 105/μg DNA of the wheat bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of DV92 constructed by Lijavetzky et al [12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The lack of a complete genome sequence limits the research available of the wheat genome Under these circumstances, a large-insert genome library is critical for physical mapping, map-based gene cloning, whole-genome sequencing, Int. J. BAC libraries of small-genome grass species such as rice have been used for comparative mapping and gene cloning in wheat [6,7,8,9]. This strategy could be adventurous because of genome rearrangement and evolution. An improved descending pooling system for BAC library screening is developed and applied

Construction of Three Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Libraries
Average Insert Size
Contamination with Organelle DNA
Genome Coverage
Descending Pooling
High Efficiency of Descending Pooling System
Plant Material
HMW DNA Isolation and Partial Digest
Optimizing Ligation Condition
Checking Insert Size
DNA Probes and Southern Blot
Library Screening
Comparison between 6D and Descending Pooling Strategy
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.