Abstract
This paper summarizes the relevant literature through the content analysis method and combines expert advice. The company built a four‐level indicator including traffic knowledge and skills, and 13 pilot‐level traffic literacy evaluation indicators system including traffic rules and mechanical common sense. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis method is used to determine the weight of each indicator of urban driver traffic literacy evaluation, and conduct pilot survey and evaluation of motor vehicle drivers in Zhengzhou. The results show that the evaluation value of motor vehicle driver traffic literacy in Zhengzhou is 72.07, including a traffic knowledge score of 77.09, traffic awareness score of 73.95, traffic skill score of 78.12, and traffic behavior score of up to 84.3. It shows that the respondents have relatively more active and responsible traffic behaviors and have a certain degree of understanding of traffic skills and traffic knowledge. However, they are relatively low in traffic awareness.
Highlights
With the rapid development of the country’s economy, road congestion is becoming more and more serious; traffic accidents occur frequently, and road traffic laws and regulations are violated in an endless stream, which seriously affects urban development and a resident’s quality of life in transportation [1]
Based on the concept of traffic literacy and the elemental composition of traffic literacy, this article combines the analysis of the influencing factors, formation mechanism, evaluation purpose, index selection principles of the traffic system, and after analysis and induction, constructs a subjective index system of traffic literacy. e specific subjective index layer has 13 indicators, namely, traffic rules, machinery knowledge, knowledge of laws and regulations, safety awareness, kindness to others, facility safety, situation prediction, vehicle control, preventive measures, emergency measures, self-management behaviors, driving control behaviors, and safe and civilized behaviors. e 13 indicators are classified and combined into 4 evaluation factors: traffic knowledge, traffic awareness, traffic skills, and traffic behavior
Rough the investigation and analysis of the analytic hierarchy process, the weights of the four evaluation factors, traffic knowledge, traffic awareness, traffic skills, and traffic behavior, are respectively: 0.2397, 0.1127, 0.0819, and 0.5657. e results show that the weight of traffic awareness is relatively high in the driver’s traffic literacy evaluation index. e indicators with higher weights of the third-level indicators are traffic rules (0.4163), safety awareness (0.6950), vehicle control (0.6759), and self-management behavior (0.5266)
Summary
With the rapid development of the country’s economy, road congestion is becoming more and more serious; traffic accidents occur frequently, and road traffic laws and regulations are violated in an endless stream, which seriously affects urban development and a resident’s quality of life in transportation [1]. To facilitate the research and the operability of the evaluation model, combine the influencing factors, formation mechanism, evaluation purpose, and index selection principles of the transportation system [3,4,5, 9,10,11,12], and after analysis and summarization, a subjective index system of traffic literacy is constructed It includes 13 subjective indicators such as traffic rules, general knowledge of machinery, knowledge of laws and regulations, safety awareness, treatment of others, facility safety, situation prediction, vehicle control, preventive measures, emergency measures, self-management behaviors, driving control behaviors, safe and civilized behaviors, etc.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
