Abstract

This paper focuses on the ‘boys’ literacy crisis’ and the demand for more boy-friendly literacy practices. Contemporary approaches to promoting reading for boys are commonly underpinned by sex role socialisation and recuperative masculinity theories. In this article, I critique open-access websites created by pseudo-experts for the purposes of promoting reading for boys and explore how they contribute to and perpetuate constructions of a hegemonic masculinity. In analysing these websites, I draw on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to foreground how the recommended strategies suggested on these websites contribute to essentialised understandings of masculinities. Interventions which are focused on stereotypical understandings of boys as messy, naughty and subversive and unmotivated due to a feminised education system are highly problematic. The article draws attention to how these strategies perpetuate social myths created within the boys’ literacy crisis discourse which, rather than supporting boys’ reading, serves to create further alienation from literacy classrooms and practices.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.