Abstract

Observers from a variety of disciplines agree that informal settlements account for the majority of housing in many cities of the global South. Urban informal settlements, usually defined by certain criteria such as self-build housing, sub-standard services, and residents’ low incomes, are often seen as problematic, due to associations with poverty, irregularity and marginalisation. In particular, despite years of research and policy, gaps in urban theory and limited understandings of urban informal settlements mean that they are often treated as outside ‘normal’ urban considerations, with material effects for residents including discrimination, eviction and displacement. In response to these considerations, this article uses a place-making approach to explore the spatial, social and cultural construction of place in this context, in order to unsettle some of the assumptions underlying discursive constructions of informal settlements, and how these relate to spatial and social marginalisation. Research was carried out using a qualitative, ethnographic methodology in two case study neighbourhoods in Xalapa, Mexico.Mexico offers fertile ground to explore these issues. Despite an extensive land tenure regularisation programme, at least 60 per cent of urban dwellers live in colonias populares, neighbourhoods with informal characteristics. The research found that local discourses reveal complex and ambivalent views of colonias populares, which both reproduce and undermine marginalising tendencies relating to ‘informality’. A focus on residents’ own place-making activities hints at prospects for rethinking urban informal settlements. By capturing the messy, dynamic and contextualised processes that construct urban informal settlements as places, the analytical lens of place-making offers a view of the multiple influences which frame them. Informed by perspectives from critical social geography which seek to capture the ‘ordinary’ nature of cities, this article suggests imagining urban informal settlements differently, in order to re-evaluate their potential contribution to the city as a whole.

Highlights

  • Urban informal settlements and marginalisationThe world is going through an unprecedented period of urbanisation

  • Place-making has the capacity to uncover the complexity of social relations contained within the processes which affect urban informal settlements as places

  • A focus on place-making is suggested in order to explore lived experiences of urban informal settlements, to connect social relations with spatial construction, and to see how these places relate to the production of knowledge about them, which may have tangible effects for urban residents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world is going through an unprecedented period of urbanisation. Observers agree that at some point in 2008, a momentous milestone was reached, heralding a new urban era: for the first time in history, half of humanity, or 3.3 billion people, lived in urban areas (Davis, 2006: 1; UN-Habitat, 2008: 11). Massive urbanisation is occurring not just in the feted megacities but in widespread ‘faintly visible second-tier cities and smaller urban areas’ (Davis, 2004: 7) It is small and intermediate cities which contain the majority of the world’s urban population, as more than half live in cities of fewer than 500,000 inhabitants, and one-fifth in cities of between one and five million (UN-Habitat, 2006: viii). Key characteristics usually associated with informal settlements are irregular land tenure, self-build housing, low level of infrastructure and residents with low incomes The price of this new urban order is increasing inequalities within and between cities (Davis, 2006). The increasing spread of informal settlements housing large numbers of the urban poor in low- and middle-income nations of the global South is nothing less than the ‘physical and spatial manifestation of urban poverty and intra-city inequality’ (UN-Habitat, 2003: xxvi)

Limits of knowledge and the idea of place
Constructing informality and ordinary places
Approaches to urban informality
Urban informal settlements: ordinary places?
A place-making approach to urban informal settlements
Conclusion
Urban informal settlements in Mexico
Mexico’s changing urban context
Case study I
Case study II
Dysfunctional urban development
Another world
Disorderly culture
A Place in the City: resident place-making in colonias populares
Spatial place-making
Social place-making
Cultural place-making
Conclusion: the potential of place-making
The production of knowledge and ordinary places
Gaps in urban theory and urban dwellers’ agency
Findings
Future research directions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call