Abstract

The research reported in this article focuses on a comparison of two different approaches to setting error bounds, or prediction intervals, on short-term forecasting of solar irradiation as well as solar and wind farm output. Short term in this instance relates to the time scales applicable in the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM), which operates on a five-minute basis throughout the year. The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) has decided in recent years that, as well as point forecasts of energy, it is advantageous for planning purposes to have error bounds on those forecasts. We use quantile regression as one of the techniques to construct the bounds. This procedure is compared to a method of forecasting the conditional variance by use of either ARCH/GARCH or exponential smoothing, whichever is more appropriate for the specific application. The noise terms for these techniques must undergo a normalising transformation before their application. It seems that, for certain applications, quantile regression performs better, and the other technique for some other applications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.