Abstract

AbstractFour azide–copper coordination polymers, [Cu2L1(N3)4]n, [Cu2L2(N3)4]n, [Cu2L3R(N3)4]n, and [Cu2L3S(N3)4]n, were synthesized by using pybox [pyridine‐2,6‐bis(oxazolines)] as coligands {L1: 2,6‐bis(4,5‐dihydrooxazol‐2‐yl)pyridine; L2: 2,6‐bis(5,6‐dihydro‐4H‐1,3‐oxazin‐2‐yl)pyridine; L3R or 3S: 2,6‐bis[(R or S)‐4‐benzyl‐4,5‐dihydrooxazol‐2‐yl]pyridine}. Compounds 1 and 2 possess similar 1D infinite azide–copper hexagonal tapes with three types of N3 bridges (two single end‐on N3 bridges and one double end‐on N3 bridge). Compounds 3R and 3S possess an azide–copper 2D honeycomb layer with two types of N3 bridges (a single end‐to‐end N3 bridge and a double end‐on N3 bridge). The chirality of these enantiopure layered structures is controlled by the addition of the chiral pybox ligand in the synthesis, which is very rare for the reported azide–copper coordination polymers. The double end‐on N3 bridge transfers mainly ferromagnetic exchange coupling interactions in these four compounds. Owing to the steric hindrance of the pybox ligands, the interchain and interlayer separations are broadened, which weakens the magnetic interactions between them. Thus, no long‐range ferromagnetic ordering was observed above 1.8 K. A magnetostructural correlation was also discussed in detail.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.