Abstract

Recently, there has been a lot of interest in characterising the connectivity of resting state brain networks. Most of the literature uses functional connectivity to examine these intrinsic brain networks. Functional connectivity has well documented limitations because of its inherent inability to identify causal interactions. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) is a framework that allows for the identification of the causal (directed) connections among neuronal systems — known as effective connectivity. This technical note addresses the validity of a recently proposed DCM for resting state fMRI – as measured in terms of their complex cross spectral density – referred to as spectral DCM. Spectral DCM differs from (the alternative) stochastic DCM by parameterising neuronal fluctuations using scale free (i.e., power law) forms, rendering the stochastic model of neuronal activity deterministic. Spectral DCM not only furnishes an efficient estimation of model parameters but also enables the detection of group differences in effective connectivity, the form and amplitude of the neuronal fluctuations or both. We compare and contrast spectral and stochastic DCM models with endogenous fluctuations or state noise on hidden states. We used simulated data to first establish the face validity of both schemes and show that they can recover the model (and its parameters) that generated the data. We then used Monte Carlo simulations to assess the accuracy of both schemes in terms of their root mean square error. We also simulated group differences and compared the ability of spectral and stochastic DCMs to identify these differences. We show that spectral DCM was not only more accurate but also more sensitive to group differences. Finally, we performed a comparative evaluation using real resting state fMRI data (from an open access resource) to study the functional integration within default mode network using spectral and stochastic DCMs.

Highlights

  • In recent years there has been a marked increase in research that combines resting state fMRI with large-scale ‘network analyses’ (Nakagawa et al, 2013; Smith et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2010)

  • Razi et al / NeuroImage 106 (2015) 1–14. These models are similar to conventional deterministic Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for fMRI (Friston et al, 2003) but include these statistics of endogenous activity that reproduce functional connectivity — of the sort observed in resting state fMRI

  • The resting state model of effective connectivity is simple – and admits only a limited repertoire of dynamical behaviour – the inclusion of endogenous fluctuations provides a plausible model of intrinsic brain networks: intrinsic dynamics are thought to be generated by the dynamic instabilities that occur near bifurcations; i.e., dynamics that accompany a loss of stability when certain control parameter(s) reach a critical value (Deco and Jirsa, 2012; Freyer et al, 2011; Robinson et al, 2002)

Read more

Summary

Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI

Adeel Razi a,b,⁎, Joshua Kahan c, Geraint Rees a,d, Karl J. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) is a framework that allows for the identification of the causal (directed) connections among neuronal systems — known as effective connectivity This technical note addresses the validity of a recently proposed DCM for resting state fMRI – as measured in terms of their complex cross spectral density – referred to as spectral DCM. Spectral DCM furnishes an efficient estimation of model parameters and enables the detection of group differences in effective connectivity, the form and amplitude of the neuronal fluctuations or both. We performed a comparative evaluation using real resting state fMRI data (from an open access resource) to study the functional integration within default mode network using spectral and stochastic DCMs

Introduction
Dynamic casual modelling of resting brain networks
The generative model
Dynamic instabilities and intrinsic brain networks
Free energy and Bayesian model inversion
Inversion of stochastic models in time domain
Inversion of stochastic models in spectral domain
Comparative inversions and face validity
Network or graph generating data
Estimation accuracy and session length
Comparative inversions testing for group differences
An empirical application
IPC mPFC PCC
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call