Abstract

Hyperspectral unmixing (HU) has become an important technique in exploiting hyperspectral data since it decomposes a mixed pixel into a collection of endmembers weighted by fractional abundances. The endmembers of a hyperspectral image (HSI) are more likely to be generated by independent sources and be mixed in a macroscopic degree before arriving at the sensor element of the imaging spectrometer as mixed spectra. Over the past few decades, many attempts have focused on imposing auxiliary regularizes on the conventional nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) framework in order to effectively unmix these mixed spectra. As a promising step toward finding an optimum regularizer to extract endmembers, this paper presents a novel blind HU algorithm, referred to as Kurtosis-based Smooth Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (KbSNMF) which incorporates a novel regularizer based on the statistical independence of the probability density functions of endmember spectra. Imposing this regularizer on the conventional NMF framework promotes the extraction of independent endmembers while further enhancing the parts-based representation of data. Experiments conducted on diverse synthetic HSI datasets (with numerous numbers of endmembers, spectral bands, pixels, and noise levels) and three standard real HSI datasets demonstrate the validity of the proposed KbSNMF algorithm compared to several stateof- the-art NMF-based HU baselines. The proposed algorithm exhibits superior performance especially in terms of extracting endmember spectra from hyperspectral data; therefore, it could uplift the performance of recent deep learning HU methods which utilize the endmember spectra as supervisory input data for abundance extraction.

Highlights

  • H YPERSPECTRAL image (HSI) technology has become a leading imaging technology in many fields including medical imaging, food quality assessment, forensic sciences, surveillance, and remote sensing [1]

  • Bayesian self organizing maps (BSOM) [17], independent component analysis (ICA) [18], [19], independent factor analysis (IFA) [20], dependent component analysis (DECA) [21], automated morphological endmember extraction (AMEE) [22], nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) [23] and spatial-spectral endmember extraction algorithm (SSEE) [24] are some of the popular statistical algorithms utilized for hyperspectral unmixing (HU)

  • Vertex component analysis (VCA) [25], minimum volume transform (MVT) [26], simplex identification via split augmented Lagrangian (SISAL) [27], optical real-time adaptive spectral identification system (ORASIS) [28], and iterative error analysis (IEA) [29] are some of the geometric algorithms frequently utilized for HU

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

H YPERSPECTRAL image (HSI) technology has become a leading imaging technology in many fields including medical imaging, food quality assessment, forensic sciences, surveillance, and remote sensing [1]. Inspired by the interpretable parts-based representations and simplicity of imposing auxiliary regularizes of the conventional NMF framework, and motivated by our previous work [58]–[64], this study proposes a novel regularizer to the conventional NMF framework named Average Kurtosis regularizer Incorporating this regularizer along with an abundance smoothing mechanism, we present a novel blind HU algorithm named Kurtosis-based Smooth Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (KbSNMF) along with its two variants KbSNMF-fnorm and KbSNMF-div. Experiments are conducted on diverse synthetic HSI datasets (with numerous numbers of endmembers, spectral bands, pixels, and noise levels) as well as on three standard real HSI datasets These experiments substantiate that the proposed algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art NMF-based blind HU algorithms in many instances, especially in extracting endmember spectra.

BACKGROUND
Kurtosis of a Signal
Average Kurtosis
Derivative of Average Kurtosis
KbSNMF-fnorm
KbSNMF-div
Initialization
Normalization
Convergence
Termination
Parameter Selection
Computational Complexity
Performance Criteria
Experimental Setting
Experiments on simulated data
Methods
Experiments on real data
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.