Constitutions, Courts and the Study of Religion

Abstract

Court deliberations and decisions have some bearing on the study of religion in colleges and universities which are supported in some way from tax monies. U.S. Supreme Court doctrineon religion and the state involves a threefold test of constitutionality. There must be: (1) a clear purpose; (2) a direct and immediate (formerly primary) effect of neither advancing nor inhibiting religion (neutrality); and (3) avoidance of undue entanglement of religion and government. Court language which has become controlling in the application of this doctrine the study of religion is: objectively as part of a secular program of education .. . This language was appealed extensively in the one court case in which a state university course relating religion was directly challenged. court records and opinions in that case, in which two Bible Presbyterian clergymen attempted unsuccessfully force the University of Washington discontinue the course The Bible as Literature, are examined. So also are those in two recent cases in which public support of the study of religion and theology was the object of some inquiry in connection with constitutional challenges of public support of certain or church-related colleges in Connecticut and Maryland. In one of these cases the courts found that the courses in religion and theology at the four defendant Catholic colleges in Connecticut were constitutionally acceptable because academic freedom was espoused at those colleges, there was no evidence of efforts indoctrinate or proselytize, the courses covered a wide range of human experiences and involved teachers of various faiths, and they fitted into the predominant higher education mission of those institutions to provide their students with a secular education. ... In the other case the District Court, while ruling that public aid the defendant Maryland colleges is constitutional, excluded courses in theology and religion from that aid. Despite the testimony of an expert witness that these courses were academically legitimate, the Court concluded that a possibility existed that they were designed primarily deepen religious experiences in a particular faith and hence might not be taught in accordance with accepted academic canons. Since the U.S. Supreme Court