Abstract
In Richmond v. Huq , 872 F.3d 355 (6th Cir. 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit considered whether summary judgment for the defendants was appropriate in a case alleging that the psychiatric care provided to the plaintiff in jail amounted to cruel and unusual punishment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
