Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of the constitutional right to resistance. The right to resist is one of the oldest rights, which began its constitutionalization with the appearance of the first constitutional documents - the Declaration of Independence of the United States in 1776, the French Declaration of Human and Civil Rights in 1789 and 1793. Today it is a familiar element of constitutional design. constitutional consolidation. At the same time, the content of this right and the criteria for its implementation are still insufficiently defined. The right to resist is associated with the protection of the constitution in the face of tyranny, as well as with the exercise of a number of political rights, with or without violation of the law, with or without the use of force. An approach is analyzed according to which the right to resist in a pluralistic democracy is not in itself necessary as an active one, but it should be as a reminder (prevention) for supporters of totalitarianism, as well as a means of educating democratic thinking. It is concluded that further research on this rule is essential in Ukraine. This concerns the development of a scientifically sound approach to the constitutionalization of the right to resist, as well as a legal assessment of the events of autumn 2004 and late 2013-early 2014. Similarly, understanding the concept of the right to resist helps to understand the content of as a result of the exercise of the right to revolt, gaining new legitimacy, and subsequently to defend the relevant right. The uprising can be seen from the standpoint of the current constitution as a challenge to the existing system and an encroachment on its legitimacy. Strictly speaking, therefore, the purpose of the uprising, its grounds and legitimate means for assessing the constitutionality are extremely important. The constitutionalization of the right to resist helps to use the existing legal arsenal of concepts and concepts to provide a legal assessment and develop appropriate criteria for the legitimacy of resistance.

Highlights

  • Спротив або ж право на революцію чи повстання є чи не найбільш дискусійним правом людини

  • Так само осягнення концепції права на опір допомагає зрозуміти зміст установчої влади і певний парадокс: нова конституція може як виникати в результаті реалізації права на повстання, отримуючи нову легітимність, так і згодом захищатися відповідним правом

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Право на опір пов’язують із захистом конституції в умовах тиранії, а також із реалізацією низки політичних прав, із порушенням закону або ж навіть і без такого порушення, із застосуванням сили або без такого. Ключові слова: право на опір; повстання; революція; права людини; народ. Головна передумова Декларації незалежності полягає в тому, що народ має право на повстання, якщо він вирішить, що уряд відмовляє йому від надання законних прав.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.