Abstract

The article substantiates the position that the teachings of the Enlightenment were compatible with the foundations of class society and absolute monarchy. The formation of the branch of constitutional law is usually associated with the “Great Rebellion” and “Glorious Revolution” in England. However, as a result of the English revolution, an unwritten constitution appeared, the interpretation of which gave rise to three approaches: the “divine right” of R. Filmer, the theory of the social contract of J. R. Tolkien. Locke and the theory of the “ancient constitution”. The foundation of the science of constitutional law was laid by the teachings of the Enlightenment of the XVIII century. The ideas of “natural” equality, personal and political rights and freedoms, the restriction of “despotism” by law and the separation of powers contradicted the foundations of class society and absolute monarchies, but they were compatible with them. Enlightenment figures held positions in the royal service or were influential writers of their time. The doctrine and lawmaking of the “enlightened” monarchy of Catherine II was based on these teachings, which led to the assimilation of a number of constitutional and legal ideas and the formation of state law of the Russian Empire.

Highlights

  • Этапным трудом в изучении «законной монархии» Екатерины II стали исследования О

  • The article substantiates the position that the teachings of the Enlightenment were compatible with the foundations of class society and absolute monarchy

  • The formation of the branch of constitutional law is usually associated with the “Great Rebellion” and “Glorious Revolution” in England

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Этапным трудом в изучении «законной монархии» Екатерины II стали исследования О. Михаил Олегович АКИШИН, профессор кафедры теории и истории государства и права Ленинградского государственного университета имени А. В статье обосновывается положение о том, что учения эпохи Просвещения были совместимы с основами сословного общества и абсолютной монархии.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.