CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING NUMBER 90/PUU-XXI/2023 REGARDING ASPECTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the Constitutional Court decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on aspects of human rights. This research uses a juridical-normative approach by examining the legal aspects of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 through a literature review. The focus of research here is on aspects of human rights (HAM) and power holders. In this case, the Constitutional Court's decision received public attention regarding the age limit for presidential and vice presidential candidates, giving rise to pros and cons in society. This literature review highlights the controversy over Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and analyzes the authority of the Constitutional Court in the context of human rights and power holders. The discussion involved the principle of separation of powers and the role of the Constitutional Court as a judicial institution. Although the Constitutional Court's decisions reflect constitutional interpretation, their impact on political and social dynamics shows the complexity of the relationship between law and social life. The results of this research show A careful and comprehensive analysis of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 shows the complexity of the relationship between law, political decisions, and social life, as well as the importance of a deep understanding of the legal and constitutional context in evaluating the consequences of certain legal decisions.