Abstract
THIS article shows that congressional voting behavior can be analyzed usefully with a simple principal-agent model. This model, in which political competition constrains legislative agents to serve the interests of those who pay for their services-with votes and other forms of political currency (for example, campaign funds)-is often the starting point for economic analysis of legislation. But a frequent conclusion has been that political ornithology is at least as important as the interests of constituents in explaining legislative voting behavior. Thus, liberal democrats, for example, tend to vote alike on many specific issues where the diversity of their constituencies would seem to suggest otherwise. This result has emerged in a number of empirical studies of voting that share a common methodology.' This typically starts with a statistical model such as
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.