Abstract

Corruption in public procurement transforms state institutions into private entities where public resources get diverted for the benefit of a few. On this matter, much of the discussion centers on the legal fulfillment of the procurement process, while there are fewer formal analyses related to the corporate features which are most likely to signal organized crime and corruption. The lack of systematic evidence on this subject has the potential to bias our understanding of corruption, making it overly focused on the public sector. Nevertheless, corruption scandals worldwide tell of the importance of taking a better look at the misuse and abuse of corporations for corrupt purposes. In this context, the research presented here seeks to contribute to the understanding of the criminal conspiracy of companies involved in public procurement corruption scandals under a network and complexity science perspective. To that end, we make use of a unique dataset of the corporate ownership and management information of four important and recently documented cases of corruption in Mexico, where hundreds of companies were used to embezzle billions of dollars. Under a bipartite network approach, we explore the relations between companies and their personnel (shareholders, legal representatives, administrators, and commissioners) in order to characterize their static and dynamic networked structure. In terms of organized crime and using different network properties, we describe how these companies connect with each other due to the existence of shared personnel with role multiplicity, leading to very different conspiracy networks. To best quantify this behavior, we introduce a heuristic network-based conspiracy indicator that together with other network metrics describes the differences and similarities among the networks associated with each corruption case. Finally, we discuss some public policy elements that might be needed to be considered in anti-corruption efforts related to corporate organized crime.

Highlights

  • Corruption is a complex adaptive problem that threatens the integrity of modern societies

  • According to Steffensmeier, the normative concept of organized crime groups is typically defined after three main characteristics: a formalized structure whose primary objective is to obtain money through illegal activities, the structure’s activity has continuity over time, and it maintains its position through use of violence or threat of violence, corruption of public officials, and extortion [34]

  • Networks as criminal organizations are difficult to prosecute because they camouflage information and actions, and they grant impunity by adding security actors, such as public functionaries and politicians [34, 36], and by acting in criminal conspiracy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Corruption is a complex adaptive problem that threatens the integrity of modern societies. According to the United Nations, corruption is a transnational phenomenon that affects all societies in deep and multiple ways, at their political, economic, ecological, and social fronts [1, 2]. Many legal corruption types are common at all stages of the procurement process, such as embezzlement, bribery, conflict of interest, fraud, conspiracy, and the use of shell companies to alter competition, among others [3, 9]. For those reasons, governments lose a significant amount of funds in corrupt practices, and purchasing is considered a high-risk activity [4, 9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call