Abstract
Abstract Objectives Quality control measurements are a keystone in daily routine laboratory workflows. This study evaluated the use of a consolidated quality control material for increasing efficiency while also reducing costs. Methods Quality control materials from two different manufacturers were chosen to evaluate efficiency in a test setting. A total of 23 clinical chemistry tests and 15 immunoassays were performed twice each day under routine conditions over a 10-day time period using an Abbott Alinity system. Results The data obtained showed a saving of between 40 and 100% depending on test criteria. The cost savings in waste reduction ranges between a factor of 5.4 for dead volume to 19.8 for consumables. No difference in quality performance were found. Conclusions Choosing a consolidated quality control material resulted in a higher efficiency, greater cost savings and higher sustainability while maintaining the same level of performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
