Abstract

Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.

Highlights

  • The goal of the original Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement [4], was to recommend the minimum amount of information required for reporting of published health economic evaluations

  • The CHEERS 2022 statement is intended to be used for any form of health economic evaluation and is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication

  • We encourage authors to visit the CHEERS [47] and EQUATOR [48] websites to locate copies of the checklist, the Explanation and Elaboration report [39], links to educational resources, templates, translations, a link to the interactive form and future updates. We hope this update of the CHEERS statement will be useful to those who need to identify, prepare and interpret reports of health economic evaluations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Economic evaluations of health interventions are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences They can provide useful information to policy makers, payers, health professionals, Husereau et al BMC Health Services Research (2022) 22:114. CHEERS was intended to help authors provide accurate information on which health interventions are being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings are, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. In doing so, it can aid interested researchers in replicating research findings. The CHEERS statement consolidated previous health economic evaluation reporting guidelines [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] into one current, useful reporting guidance

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call