Abstract

AbstractTransient photoluminescence (TPL) and transient photovoltage (TPV) measurements are important and frequently applied methods to study recombination dynamics and charge‐carrier lifetimes in the field of halide‐perovskite photovoltaics. However, large‐signal TPL and small‐signal TPV decay times often correlate poorly and differ by orders of magnitude. In order to generate a quantitative understanding of the differences and similarities between the two methods, the impact of sample type (film vs device), large‐ versus small‐signal analysis, and differences in detection mode (voltage vs. luminescence) are explained using analytical and numerical models compared with experimental data. The main solution to achieving a consistent framework that describes both methods is the calculation of a voltage or carrier density dependent decay time that can be interpreted in terms of a capacitive region, a region dominated by defect‐assisted recombination and a region that is dominated by higher order recombination (radiative and Auger). It is experimentally shown that in the efficient methylammonium lead‐iodide solar cells, effective monomolecular lifetimes ≈2 µs can be consistently measured with TPL and TPV. Furthermore, the shape of the decay time versus voltage or carrier density follows predictions derived from implicit and explicit solutions to differential equations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.