Abstract

ABSTRACT Several analyses have shown that Λ cold dark matter-based models cannot jointly describe the clustering (GC) and galaxy–galaxy lensing (GGL) of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), which is commonly known as the ‘lensing-is-low problem’. In this work, we show that an extension of Subhalo Abundance Matching, dubbed SHAMe, successfully solves this problem. First, we show that this model accurately reproduces the GC and GGL of a mock galaxy sample in the TNG300 hydrodynamic simulation with properties analogous to those of BOSS galaxies. Then, we switch our attention to observed BOSS galaxies at z = 0.31−0.43, and we attempt to reproduce their GC and GGL by evaluating SHAMe on two different simulations: one adopting best-fitting cosmological parameters from Planck and the other from weak gravitational lensing surveys (Low S8), where the amplitude of matter fluctuations is lower for the latter. We find excellent agreement between SHAMe predictions and observations for both cosmologies, indicating that the lensing-is-low problem originates from approximations in previous theoretical descriptions of the data. The main difference between SHAMe results in these cosmologies is the level of galaxy assembly bias, which is approximately 20 per cent and 10 per cent for Planck and Low S8, respectively. These results highlight the dangers of employing oversimplified models to analyse current large-scale structure data sets, and the need for realistic yet flexible descriptions of the galaxy–halo connection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call