Abstract

Mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia (MSIMI) has attracted increasing attention in the last 30 y. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is among the most accurate methods for evaluating myocardial perfusion. Even so, echocardiography seems to be a more harmless option when the radiation exposure and high expense of PET/CT are considered. To date, no previous studies have compared the consistency between echocardiography and PET/CT in the diagnosis of MSIMI. The primary aim of this research was to compare the consistency of myocardial contrast echocardiography and PET/CT in diagnosing MSIMI in women with angina symptom/ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Fifty adult female patients with INOCA were recruited for a 12-min-long mental stress test. Each patient underwent both echocardiography and PET/CT at baseline and during mental stress testing; the interval between the two examinations was 1–3 d and the sequence was assigned naturally. MSIMI is defined by a summed difference score (SDS) ≥3 on PET-CT during mental stress testing. It is also defined by new abnormal wall motion, ejection fraction reduction ≥5%, and/or development of ischemic ST change on the electrocardiogram during mental stress testing. This study examined the consistency of PET/CT and myocardial contrast echocardiography in diagnosing MSIMI.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call