Consistency of MIS with other malnutrition screening tools among adult and elderly hemodialysis patients

Abstract

Background and aimMalnutrition and inflammation commonly occur concomitantly among hemodialysis patients. Malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) is a tool that helps clinical and nutritional evaluation of patients regardless of age. This study aimed to determine the best approach by comparing different tools/indices to evaluate the malnutrition and inflammation status of patients having hemodialysis treatment regarding their age and to examine the clinical benefits and consistency of MIS with other malnutrition tools. MethodsThe study was conducted with a sample of 140 hemodialysis patients (70 adults and 70 elderly patients). The biochemical data of the patients were retrospectively obtained, and the research dietitian conducted the anthropometric measures. In addition to MIS, 7 point-SGA (7p-SGA), Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) for adults, and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) for elderly patients were used. The model's discriminatory power was examined by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. ResultsPatients who were “at-risk” according to MIS had significantly lower scores of 7p-SGA and NRI than those who had “no risk” (p<0.001). Moreover, those who are “at-risk” have significantly lower MNA scores than those who are not (p=0.002). Among adult patients, MIS displayed lower sensitivity but higher specificity with NRI than 7p-SGA. However, for elderly patients, MIS showed fair sensitivity and specificity with MNA but the highest sensitivity with GNRI. ConclusionAlthough different screening tools are available to screen malnutrition among dialysis patients regarding their age, MIS might be more clincally useful as it is more susceptible to assess both malnutrition and inflammation that occur concomitantly.