Abstract

Objective. Although magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography (M/EEG) signals at sensor level are robust and reliable, they suffer from different degrees of distortion due to changes in brain tissue conductivities, known as field spread and volume conduction effects. To estimate original neural generators from M/EEG activity acquired at sensor level, diverse source localisation algorithms have been proposed; however, they are not exempt from limitations and usually involve time-consuming procedures. Connectivity and network-based M/EEG analyses have been found to be affected by field spread and volume conduction effects; nevertheless, the influence of the aforementioned effects on widely used local activation parameters has not been assessed yet. The goal of this study is to evaluate the consistency of various local activation parameters when they are computed at sensor- and source-level. Approach. Six spectral (relative power, median frequency, and individual alpha frequency) and non-linear parameters (Lempel-Ziv complexity, sample entropy, and central tendency measure) are computed from M/EEG signals at sensor- and source-level using four source inversion methods: weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE), standardised low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA), linear constrained minimum variance (LCMV), and dynamical statistical parametric mapping (dSPM). Main results. Our results show that the spectral and non-linear parameters yield similar results at sensor- and source-level, showing high correlation values between them for all the source inversion methods evaluated and both modalities of signal, EEG and MEG. Furthermore, the correlation values remain high when performing coarse-grained spatial analyses. Significance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study analysing how field spread and volume conduction effects impact on local activation parameters computed from resting-state neural activity. Our findings evidence that local activation parameters are robust against field spread and volume conduction effects and provide equivalent information at sensor- and source-level even when performing regional analyses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.