Abstract
The semantics of objects and transactions in database systems are investigated. User-defined predicates called consistency assertions are used to specify user programs. Three new correctness criteria are proposed. The first correctness criterion consistency is based solely on the users' specifications and admit nonserializable executions that are acceptable to the users. Integrity constraints of the database are maintained through consistency assertions. The second correctness criterion orderability is a generalization of view serializability and represents a weak notion of equivalence to a serial schedule. Finally, the third correctness criterion strong order-ability is introduced as a generalization of conflict serializability. Unlike consistency, the notions of orderability allow users to operate an isolation as maintenance of the integrity constrainst now becomes the responsibility of the database system.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
