Abstract
I analyzed intuitive frequency judgments for deaths from 11 well-known causes. Data analysis at individual subjects' level showed that the response-range effect noted in 1994 by Saito, Kawabata, and Yamagishi operates at the individual subjects' level. Also, the response tendencies exhibited by individuals were highly consistent across three different methods of judgment elicitation. Implications for risk-perception research are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
