Abstract

The performance of two common picking strategies, batch picking (BP) and batch-synchronized zone picking (BSZP), are compared by considering pickers’ learning effects in online-to-offline (O2O) groceries. As we know from previous research, one major advantage of BSZP is that pickers can be more familiar with the item locations because each picker works in a relatively smaller picking area. However, few papers have formulated a quantitative method to verify this advantage. To address this, we use pickers’ learning effects to quantify their familiarity with the item locations, and then compare the picking efficiency in BP and BSZP with learning effects. The optimization models of BP and BSZP are formulated to minimize the total service time, and heuristic methods are proposed to solve these models. The case study is implemented under three order types and three storage assignment policies, i.e. Random, ABC-1, and ABC-2. The results of the study indicate that with learning effects, although BSZP needs a longer travel time than BP, it requires a shorter search time. Which strategy, BP or BSZP, is more efficient mainly depends on the learning rates, storage assignment policies, and pickers’ working days. When the storage assignments are Random and ABC-1, a smaller learning rate can lead BSZP to perform better than BP. When the storage assignment is ABC-2, BSZP performs better than BP. When pickers’ working days are long enough, the learning effect is weakened, and BP outperforms. Awareness of the learning effects is required to choose a better picking strategy, evaluate more accurate picking efficiency and hire an appropriate number of pickers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call