Abstract
The electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) inverse problem highly relies on adding constraints, a process called regularization, as the problem is ill-posed. When there are no prior information provided about the unknown epicardial potentials, the Tikhonov regularization method seems to be the most commonly used technique. In the Tikhonov approach the weight of the constraints is determined by the regularization parameter. However, the regularization parameter is problem and data dependent, meaning that different numerical models or different clinical data may require different regularization parameters. Then, we need to have as many regularization parameter-choice methods as techniques to validate them. In this work, we addressed this issue by showing that the Discrete Picard Condition (DPC) can guide a good regularization parameter choice for the two-norm Tikhonov method. We also studied the feasibility of two techniques: The U-curve method (not yet used in the cardiac field) and a novel automatic method, called ADPC due its basis on the DPC. Both techniques were tested with simulated and experimental data when using the method of fundamental solutions as a numerical model. Their efficacy was compared with the efficacy of two widely used techniques in the literature, the L-curve and the CRESO methods. These solutions showed the feasibility of the new techniques in the cardiac setting, an improvement of the morphology of the reconstructed epicardial potentials, and in most of the cases of their amplitude.
Highlights
Cardiovascular diseases causes 17.9 million deaths every year, accounting for 31% of all global deaths
Some of the effects related to the regularization parameter choice methods for a single site pacing in the midwall left ventricle in-silico dataset are depicted in Figures 3, 4 below
Two new methods were introduced to calculate the regularization parameter of the two-norm Tikhonov regularization method when using the method of fundamental solution (MFS) for Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI): The U-curve and the ADPC
Summary
Cardiovascular diseases causes 17.9 million deaths every year, accounting for 31% of all global deaths. For the ECGI, we will focus on the latter From this latter group, we will focus on regularization parameter-choice methods that can be extended to the new goals (i.e., methods that consider information about the residual norm and about the solution norm). This choice is due to the recent interest in improving the ECGI inverse solution by introducing physiological-based prior information on the regularization term (Figuera et al, 2016; Duchateau et al, 2018)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.