Abstract
AbstractFor recent hydroelectric pumped storage projects, the construction of embankment dam structures on alluvial deposits consisting of exceptionally soft soil and in areas with high seismicity was required. This contribution shares experiences and challenges from the static and seismic design of embankment dam structures and ground treatment options. Finite element‐based static and seismic analyses using the Hardening Soil Small Strain model (HSS) showed that preconsolidation has clear benefits compared to stone columns for ground improvement purposes. Regardless of general advantages of surface sealing systems for frequent and rapid impoundment level changes, it was found that clay core design options perform very well under seismic loading conditions and even better than surface‐sealed structures. Seismic ground and structure response analyses involving soft soil considering shear strain‐dependent stiffness degradation revealed that deamplification is expected in contrast to the rule‐of‐thumb amplification approaches enshrined in many seismic design guidelines and codes. It was found that this effect increases with seismic magnitudes and that saturation of peak ground acceleration (PGA) takes place. This results in relatively moderate structure excitations even under significant dynamic excitation.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
