Abstract
Indicator‐based spectrophotometric pH is commonly used for the analysis of seawater because of its high precision and long‐term reproducibility. Users come from an increasingly diverse range of disciplines, primarily motivated by studies focused on the causes and effects of ocean acidification. While the analysis is readily implemented and straightforward, there are many variables that must be predetermined or measured, all of which can contribute uncertainty to the measurement. The indicator equilibrium constant and molar absorption coefficient ratios are available in the literature, but for various reasons, the conditions of analysis can be different, creating errors. Most of the parameters are temperature, salinity, and pressure dependent, posing potential additional errors. Indicator impurities and indicator perturbation of the sample pH also create uncertainties. We systematically evaluate all of the sources of error and compute how the errors propagate into CO2 equilibrium calculations of the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and calcium carbonate saturation states (Ω). The primary sources of uncertainty originate from wavelength and absorbance errors in low quality or poorly functioning spectrophotometers (0.007 to 0.020 pH units) and indicator impurities (0.000 to >0.040 pH units). These errors generate pCO2 and Ω uncertainties of 11‐200 µatm and 0.08‐0.38, respectively, depending upon the pH value and its uncertainty.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.