Abstract
Background Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns. Preparations for clinical trials are well-described, as are the steps for multi-component health service trials. However, guidance is lacking for addressing the ethical and logistic challenges in (cluster) RCTs of population health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Objective We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning RCTs within North–South partnerships. Design We reviewed our experiences and identified key ethical and logistic issues encountered during the pre-trial phase of a recently implemented RCT. This trial aimed to improve tuberculosis (TB) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and care for health workers by enhancing workplace assessment capability, addressing concerns about confidentiality and stigma, and providing onsite counseling, testing, and treatment. An iterative framework was used to synthesize this analysis with lessons taken from other studies. Results The checklist of critical factors was grouped into eight categories: 1) Building trust and shared ownership; 2) Conducting feasibility studies throughout the process; 3) Building capacity; 4) Creating an appropriate information system; 5) Conducting pilot studies; 6) Securing stakeholder support, with a view to scale-up; 7) Continuously refining methodological rigor; and 8) Explicitly addressing all ethical issues both at the start and continuously as they arise. Conclusion Researchers should allow for the significant investment of time and resources required for successful implementation of population health RCTs within North–South collaborations, recognize the iterative nature of the process, and be prepared to revise protocols as challenges emerge.
Highlights
IntroductionObjective: We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) within NorthÁSouth partnerships
Community-based cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly being conducted to address pressing global health concerns
Using the iterative framework recommended for complex Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [6, 7], we employed a narrative approach to describe the challenges and issues encountered as we embarked on this large collaborative RCT launched in Free State, South Africa, to evaluate whether strengthening Occupational Health Units (OHUs) to implement the WHOÁILOÁUNAIDS guidelines in-house is effective, and if so, what determines successful outcomes
Summary
Objective: We aimed to identify the factors that population health researchers must explicitly consider when planning RCTs within NorthÁSouth partnerships. Design: We reviewed our experiences and identified key ethical and logistic issues encountered during the pre-trial phase of a recently implemented RCT. This trial aimed to improve tuberculosis (TB) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prevention and care for health workers by enhancing workplace assessment capability, addressing concerns about confidentiality and stigma, and providing onsite counseling, testing, and treatment. Conclusion: Researchers should allow for the significant investment of time and resources required for successful implementation of population health RCTs within NorthÁSouth collaborations, recognize the iterative nature of the process, and be prepared to revise protocols as challenges emerge
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.