Abstract
PurposePurpose of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcome after conservatively treated first-time posterior shoulder dislocations and to determine structural defects associated with failure.MethodsIn this multi-centric retrospective study, 29 shoulders in 28 patients with first-time acute posterior shoulder dislocation (Type A1 or A2 according to the ABC classification) and available cross-sectional imaging were included. Outcome scores as well as radiological and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained at a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 2.7 years (minimum: 5 years). The association of structural defects with redislocation, need for secondary surgery, and inferior clinical outcomes were analysed.ResultsRedislocation occurred in six (21%) shoulders and nine shoulders (31%) underwent secondary surgery due to persistent symptoms. The posttraumatic posterior glenohumeral subluxation was higher in the redislocation group compared to the no redislocation group; however, statistical significance was not reached (61.9 ± 12.5% vs. 50.6 ± 6.4%). Furthermore, a higher adapted gamma angle was observed in the failed conservative treatment group versus the conservative treatment group, similarly without statistically significant difference (97.8° ± 7.2°, vs. 93.3° ± 9.7°). The adapted gamma angle was higher than 90° in all patients of failed conservative therapy and the redislocation group. An older age at the time of dislocation showed a significant correlation with better clinical outcomes (SSV: r = 0.543, p = 0.02; ROWE: r = 0.418, p = 0.035 and WOSI: r = 0.478, p = 0.045). Posterior glenohumeral subluxation after trauma correlated with a worse WOSI (r = − 0.59, p = 0.02) and follow-up posterior glenohumeral decentring (r = 0.68, p = 0.007). The gamma angle (r = 0.396, p = 0.039) and depth of the reverse Hill–Sachs lesion (r = 0.437, p = 0.023) correlated significantly with the grade of osteoarthritis at follow-up.ConclusionConservative treatment is a viable option in patients with an acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation with good outcome after mid- and long-term follow-up especially in patients with centred joint, low gamma angle, and middle or old age.Level of evidenceIV.
Highlights
The term posterior shoulder instability (PSI) encompasses a large spectrum of different subpathologies
Acute surgical treatment is warranted in patients with large and medially located reverse Hill–Sachs defects and large and displaced posterior glenoid rim fractures [19, 20], conservative treatment is a viable option for patients with only soft tissue or minor bony lesions after an acute posterior shoulder dislocation [21]
Inclusion criteria were (1) a type A1 or A2 posterior shoulder instability according to the ABC classification of PSI [21], (2) age > 18 years, (3) minimum follow-up of 5 years since the first posterior shoulder instability event, (4) an initial conservative treatment strategy and (5) presence of a Computerised Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan of the affected shoulder at the time point of the trauma
Summary
The term posterior shoulder instability (PSI) encompasses a large spectrum of different subpathologies. The transition between patients with PSI Type A1 and A2 can be gradual and is characterised by increasing capsulolabral lesions and bony humeral and glenoid defects necessitating surgical treatment [21]. Acute surgical treatment is warranted in patients with large and medially located reverse Hill–Sachs defects and large and displaced posterior glenoid rim fractures [19, 20], conservative treatment is a viable option for patients with only soft tissue or minor bony lesions after an acute posterior shoulder dislocation [21]. There is a lack of clinical and radiological outcome data after conservative treatment of posterior shoulder dislocations which would allow to determine critical structural defects and the treatment type [33]. Clinical and radiological risk factors related with inferior outcomes were assessed to provide a clinical guideline on which patients can be treated conservatively
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
