Abstract
Complex Systems-on-Chips (SoC) are mixed time-criticality systems that have to support firm real-time (FRT) and soft real-time (SRT) applications running in parallel. This is challenging for critical SoC components, such as memory controllers. Existing memory controllers focus on either firm real-time or soft real-time applications. FRT controllers use a close-page policy that maximizes worst-case performance and ignore opportunities to exploit locality, since it cannot be guaranteed. Conversely, SRT controllers try to reduce latency and consequently processor stalling by speculating on locality. They often use an open-page policy that sacrifices guaranteed performance, but is beneficial in the average case. This paper proposes a conservative open-page policy that improves average-case performance of a FRT controller in terms of bandwidth and latency without sacrificing real-time guarantees. As a result, the memory controller efficiently handles both FRT and SRT applications. The policy keeps pages open as long as possible without sacrificing guarantees and captures locality in this window. Experimental results show that on average 70% of the locality is captured for applications in the CHStone benchmark, reducing the execution time by 17% compared to a close-page policy. The effectiveness of the policy is also evaluated in a multi-application use-case, and we show that the overall average-case performance improves if there is at least one FRT or SRT application that exploits locality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.