Abstract

This article problematizes the narrative that states expand their control through classifying lands adjacent to a protected area under different conservation categories, such as buffer or transition zones. Through many periods of fieldwork and interviews done in language, I found that the Lebanese state could not territorialize and control such areas next to the Shouf Biosphere Reserve (SBR). Instead, SBR’s adjacent zones presented dissimilar and attenuated territories of governance, depending on different state and local actors’ abilities to effect control in these zones at different times. This work offers a reading of how state and local actors negotiate a range of legalities in efforts to territorialize these conservation zones.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.