Abstract
Environmental protection is never a controversy-free endeavor. Conflicts arise over land ownership, use, and access. Political ecologists have paid extensive attention to protected areas, especially in relation to power, rights, and marginalized peoples. This article draws on political ecology to examine a new proposed national park in the context of post-communism and neoliberalization in Romania. Using mixed-methods (semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and participant observation), this research investigates conservation narratives as articulated by different actors (environmental non-governmental organizations, local decision-makers, and local community members) with various levels of involvement in the proposed national park. Three chief narratives can be observed pertaining to tourism, restrictions, and deforestation. These narratives are embedded in the history and socio-economic context of the area, but also reveal the agendas of different actors regarding landscape values. Assessing these narratives, this research reveals how actors position themselves and the points of contention among the different actors in the brewing conflict that the national park represents.Keywords: Political ecology, conservation, conflict, power
Highlights
Nature conservation activities are a minefield of potential conflicts over rights, access, environmental and social justice, ways of knowing nature, and management practices (Cortés-Vázquez 2014; Sen and Pattanaik 2017)
The narratives about conservation and environmental protection employed by different actors may reflect different ideologies and political agendas – contradictions which become increasingly clear in the context of contemporary protected area establishment
I analyze the conservation narratives employed by different actors in order to reveal the landscape visions and agendas that different actors hold and how these narratives manifest across scalar arrangements
Summary
Nature conservation activities are a minefield of potential conflicts over rights, access, environmental and social justice, ways of knowing nature, and management practices (Cortés-Vázquez 2014; Sen and Pattanaik 2017). I analyze the conservation narratives employed by different actors (local decisionmakers, conservationists, and local community members) in order to reveal the (conflicting) landscape visions and agendas that different actors hold and how these narratives manifest across scalar arrangements. These narratives are situated within the historical, political, and ecological context of the Făgăraș Mountains. I present three chief conservation narratives and show how these reflect the different visions for a transforming landscape, and how they are employed at different levels These narratives reveal potential points of contention, and how actors situate themselves in the brewing conflict between global conservation ideas and local reactions
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
