Abstract
A study was conducted to determine the effects of oat (Avena sativa) and grazing vetch (Vicia dasycapa) winter cover crops and fertilization regimes on soil organic matter (SOM) in an irrigated maize-based (Zea mays L.) conservation agriculture (CA) system following four years of continuous practice. Separate plots of oat and grazing vetch cover crops were grown in winter and then maize was planted in all plots in the following summer season. The four fertilization regimes used were: (i) fertilizer applied to the cover crops and the maize crop (F1), (ii) fertilizer applied to cover crops only (F2), (iii) fertilizer applied to the maize crop only (F3) and (iv) no fertilizer applied (F4). Control plots (weedy fallows) were included and the treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Soil samples from 0–5, 5–20 and 20–50cm depths were analyzed for total SOM, particulate organic matter (POM) fractions, hot water soluble C (HWC) and C-associated with water stable macro- and micro-aggregates (WSAC). While total SOM was more concentrated in the 0–5cm soil depth across treatments, a lack of maize fertilization (F2 and F4 regimes) significantly (P<0.05) reduced the stratification ratio. Oat and grazing vetch rotations produced significantly higher (P<0.05) fine POM, coarse POM and HWC than weedy fallow rotations at 0–5 and 5–20cm. When fertilized, oat was better able to support SOM sequestration in water stable aggregates at 0–20cm while grazing vetch was more effective at 20–50cm. The F3 regime had similar SOM levels as the F2. When no fertilizer was applied (F4-regime), there were significant (P<0.01) reductions in biomass input and total SOM on the oat–maize and weedy fallow–maize rotations whereas the grazing vetch–maize rotation did not respond, both at 0–5 and 5–20cm. The findings suggested that in the low fertilizer input CA system, targeting fertilizer to the winter cover crop as opposed to the maize crop could give similar SOM response, with less fertilizer invested and that grazing vetch cover crops may be better suited to low N input CA systems for SOM improvement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.