Abstract

While ecologists know that models require assumptions, the consequences of their violation become vague as model complexity increases. Integrated population models (IPMs) combine several datasets to inform a population model and to estimate survival and reproduction parameters jointly with higher precision than is possible using independent models. However, accuracy actually depends on an adequate fit of the model to datasets. We first investigated bias of parameters obtained from integrated population models when specific assumptions are violated. For instance, a model may assume that all females reproduce although there are non-breeding females in the population. Our second goal was to identify which diagnostic tests are sensitive to detect violations of the assumptions of IPMs. We simulated data mimicking a short- and a long-lived species under five scenarios in which a specific assumption is violated. For each simulated scenario, we fitted an IPM that violates the assumption (simple IPM) and an IPM that does not violate each specific assumption. We estimated bias and uncertainty of parameters and performed seven diagnostic tests to assess the fit of the models to the data. Our results show that the simple IPM was quite robust to violation of many assumptions and only resulted in small bias of the parameter estimates. Yet, the applied diagnostic tests were not sensitive to detect such small bias. The violation of some assumptions such as the absence of immigrants resulted in larger bias to which diagnostic tests were more sensitive. The parameters informed by the least amount of data were the most biased in all scenarios. We provide guidelines to identify misspecified models and to diagnose the assumption being violated. Simple models should often be sufficient to describe simple population dynamics, and when data are abundant, complex models accounting for specific processes will be able to shed light on specific biological questions.

Highlights

  • Integrated population models (IPMs) describe population dynamics based on the population model assumed by the modeller and the usefulness of the available data (Besbeas et al 2002; Schaub and Abadi 2011; Schaub and Kéry in press)

  • IPMs are widely applied in population ecology (Schaub and Abadi 2011; Zipkin et al 2019) because they describe transient dynamics and make possible to determine the influence of different environmental factors and of the contribution of each demographic rate and of population structure to population dynamics (Koons et al 2016, 2017)

  • We present the two different models used to analyze the data for each scenario: I P M0: simple IPM; and one of I P M1-I P M5: an IPM that is adjusted to the specific assumption of each scenario, a model that fits better than I P M0

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Integrated population models (IPMs) describe population dynamics based on the population model assumed by the modeller and the usefulness of the available data (Besbeas et al 2002; Schaub and Abadi 2011; Schaub and Kéry in press). Any incongruence between the population ecology (e.g. life cycle, mating system, individual homogeneity and independence, etc.) and the model or inadequate modelling of the protocol of data collection has the potential to bias the estimates of population parameters This will potentially lead to wrong conclusions or management/conservation decisions (Besbeas and Morgan 2014). IPMs are widely applied in population ecology (Schaub and Abadi 2011; Zipkin et al 2019) because they describe transient dynamics and make possible to determine the influence of different environmental factors and of the contribution of each demographic rate and of population structure to population dynamics (Koons et al 2016, 2017) This combination of data allows the estimation of demographic parameters with higher precision. The biases in these hidden parameter estimates are not systematically checked (Gamelon et al 2016), and their accuracy and interpretation are more and more questioned (Riecke et al 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call