Abstract

Local, wild-collected seeds of native plants are recommended for use in ecological restoration to maintain patterns of adaptive variation. However, some environments are so drastically altered by exotic, invasive weeds that original environmental conditions may no longer exist. Under these circumstances, cultivated varieties selected for improved germination and vigor may have a competitive advantage at highly disturbed sites. This study investigated differences in early establishment and seedling performance between wild and cultivated seed sources of the native grass, Poa secunda, both with and without competition from the invasive exotic grass, Bromus tectorum. We measured seedling survival and above-ground biomass at two experimental sites in western Montana, and found that the source of seeds selected for restoration can influence establishment at the restoration site. Cultivars had an overall advantage when compared with local genotypes, supporting evidence of greater vigor among cultivated varieties of native species. This advantage, however, declined rapidly in the presence of B. tectorum and most accessions were not significantly different for growth and survival in competition plots. Only one cultivar had a consistent advantage despite a strong decline in its performance when competing with invasive plants. As a result, cultivated varieties did not meet expectations for greater establishment and persistence relative to local genotypes in the presence of invasive, exotic species. We recommend the use of representative local or regional wild seed sources in restoration to minimize commercial selection, and a mix of individual accessions (wild, or cultivated when necessary) in highly invaded settings to capture vigorous genotypes and increase the odds native plants will establish at restoration sites.

Highlights

  • Ecological restoration of native plants depends on successful germination and establishment of seeded species, and the source of seeds for restoration may have consequences for both shortand long-term population viability [1, 2]

  • Guidelines for ecological restoration recommend the use of local seed sources to increase the likelihood that plants are adapted to site conditions, maintain genetic diversity and improve the long-term sustainability of restored plant populations [2, 9]

  • Cultivars are selected for improved germination, vigor and competitive ability, and are likely to represent low levels of genetic diversity and novel genotypes relative to remnant populations at restoration sites [12, 13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecological restoration of native plants depends on successful germination and establishment of seeded species, and the source of seeds for restoration may have consequences for both shortand long-term population viability [1, 2]. Guidelines for ecological restoration recommend the use of local seed sources to increase the likelihood that plants are adapted to site conditions, maintain genetic diversity and improve the long-term sustainability of restored plant populations [2, 9]. Few data are available for the consequences of the use of cultivars in restoration, but recent evidence suggests that cultivated varieties differ from local genotypes in morphological and physiological traits, and may alter patterns of dominance within plant communities [8, 14, 15]. Large-scale introductions of novel genotypes may have unintended consequences, such as the swamping of local genotypes, and altered community structure and function [1, 8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call