Abstract

Many landscape genetic studies aim to determine the effect of landscape on gene flow between populations. These studies frequently employ link‐based methods that relate pairwise measures of historical gene flow to measures of the landscape and the geographical distance between populations. However, apart from landscape and distance, there is a third important factor that can influence historical gene flow, that is, population topology (i.e., the arrangement of populations throughout a landscape). As the population topology is determined in part by the landscape configuration, I argue that it should play a more prominent role in landscape genetics. Making use of existing literature and theoretical examples, I discuss how population topology can influence results in landscape genetic studies and how it can be taken into account to improve the accuracy of these results. In support of my arguments, I have performed a literature review of landscape genetic studies published during the first half of 2015 as well as several computer simulations of gene flow between populations. First, I argue why one should carefully consider which population pairs should be included in link‐based analyses. Second, I discuss several ways in which the population topology can be incorporated in response and explanatory variables. Third, I outline why it is important to sample populations in such a way that a good representation of the population topology is obtained. Fourth, I discuss how statistical testing for link‐based approaches could be influenced by the population topology. I conclude the article with six recommendations geared toward better incorporating population topology in link‐based landscape genetic studies.

Highlights

  • Landscape genetic studies aim to determine the influence of landscape patterns on spatial genetic variation (Balkenhol et al, 2009; Manel & Holderegger, 2013; Manel, Schwartz, Luikart, & Taberlet, 2003)

  • One of the most studied evolutionary processes leading to genetic variation is gene flow (Hall & Beissinger, 2014; Manel & Holderegger, 2013)

  • The influence of landscape on gene flow is commonly assessed with “link-­based methods,” which have been applied in many landscape genetic studies (e.g., Coster, Babbitt, Cooper, & Kovach, 2015; Cushman, McKelvey, Hayden, & Schwartz, 2006; Emel & Storfer, 2015; Keyghobadi, Roland, & Strobeck, 1999; Row et al, 2015; Spear, Peterson, Matocq, & Storfer, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Landscape genetic studies aim to determine the influence of landscape patterns on spatial genetic variation (Balkenhol et al, 2009; Manel & Holderegger, 2013; Manel, Schwartz, Luikart, & Taberlet, 2003). The influence of landscape on gene flow is commonly assessed with “link-­based methods,” which have been applied in many landscape genetic studies (e.g., Coster, Babbitt, Cooper, & Kovach, 2015; Cushman, McKelvey, Hayden, & Schwartz, 2006; Emel & Storfer, 2015; Keyghobadi, Roland, & Strobeck, 1999; Row et al, 2015; Spear, Peterson, Matocq, & Storfer, 2005) These methods “relate pairwise genetic distance between individuals and demes to their landscape distance (e.g., geographic distance, cost distance, the presence, or number of barriers) hypothesized to be related to the probability of dispersal and migration”

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.