Abstract

Investment contract duration is a key parameter for venture capital funds operation. Variables influencing the decision around this parameter are usually treated in general principles in the classical financial literature leaving plenty of room for context sensitive research. As such, we studied variables influencing investment contract duration by investigating the performance of mature Portuguese firms that have been (partially) held by venture capital funds. Using a sample of 38 firms, sold out by venture capital funds between 1995 and 2004 we evaluated the performance of these firms using performance and sustainability indicators. We found evidence that sales growth, exports, book value, headcount and a good coverage of ISO standards implementation influenced the investment contract duration.

Highlights

  • This paper examines the impact of venture capital as a value added partner to Portuguese firms in maturity stage, especially in traditional business activities and test if whether or not this is an enduring impact, assessed by valuation increase of these firms after four years of an exit

  • Regression results – we used linear regression to estimate the influence of independent variable ‘duration on contract’ on the variables sales growth (SG) (DV1), external markets sales evolution (DV2), EBITDA evolution (DV3), book value evolution (DV4), headcount evolution (DV5) and number of quality certifications (DV6)

  • Considering two of the most used indicators in firms’ relative or comparative valuation we concluded that price sales ratio (PSR) and price book value (PBV) would have at least a positive evolution for this sample’s companies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper examines the impact of venture capital as a value added partner to Portuguese firms in maturity stage, especially in traditional business activities and test if whether or not this is an enduring impact, assessed by valuation increase of these firms after four years of an exit. We chose this type of firms – companies in maturity – for two main reasons:. Survey 2 was sent to portfolio companies’ managers but the rate of response was not representative and the data collected was not used to test variables

Theory and hypothesis
Factors influencing performance
Relative or comparative valuation
Sustained performance
Hypothesis
Dependent variables
Research method
Data collection
Portfolio companies – 1995–2004
Populations and samples
Venture capitalist information
Portfolio companies information
Discussion and conclusions
Implications and future research
Findings
Limitations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.