Abstract

BackgroundThe study design and protocol that underpin a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are critical for the ultimate success of the trial. Although RCTs are considered the gold standard for research, there are multiple threats to their validity such as participant recruitment and retention, identifying a meaningful change, and non-adherence to the protocol. For clinical RCTs, involving patients and clinicians in protocol design provides the opportunity to develop research protocols that are meaningful to their target audience and may help overcome some of the inherent threats in conducting RCTs. However, the majority of protocols do not describe the methodology underpinning their development, limiting the amount of learned experience shared between research groups.MethodWith the purpose of reporting a collaborative approach towards developing a protocol, we present the findings from three sequential workshops that were conducted with the aim of developing a protocol to investigate the feasibility of adding a computerised test of attention, impulsivity and activity (QbTest) to medication management of children and young people with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Based on previous qualitative interviews with clinicians and families, each workshop prioritised topics for focused discussion. Information from the workshops was fed back to the participants for reflection in advance of the next workshop.ResultsThe workshops involved 21 multi-disciplinary ADHD experts, including clinicians, patient and public involvement (PPI) members, parents of young people with ADHD and researchers. The consensus workshops addressed key research issues such as: the most relevant outcome measures/ resource drivers; methods and time points for data collection; and the clinical protocol for utilising the QbTest, including when best to use this within the medication management process. The resulting protocol details a feasibility RCT design describing these factors.ConclusionProtocols which are co-developed may help overcome some of the risks associated with RCT completion (e.g. recruitment, retention, protocol adherence) and help prioritise outcomes of greater relevance to the populations under study. The methodology has potential value for researchers and organisations developing clinical guidelines, and offers insights into the valuable impact of PPI upon trial design.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03368573, 11th December 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Highlights

  • The study design and protocol that underpin a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are critical for the ultimate success of the trial

  • The aim of this paper is to report the methodological development of the protocol for a feasibility study, the ‘QbTest Utility in Optimising Treatment for Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)’ (QUOTA) study [13]

  • The experts included four patient and public involvement (PPI) members, one education expert with experience of using QbTest in schools, two representatives and clinical advisors from Qbtech, one health economics expert with prior experience of ADHD studies, nine healthcare professionals from a range of backgrounds, three academic team members (MG, CLH, MJ), and two representatives from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) MindTech MedTech Co-operative (MindTech) (JLM and SB), who acted as facilitators and note-takers and brought additional PPI expertise to the workshop design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study design and protocol that underpin a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are critical for the ultimate success of the trial. For clinical RCTs, involving patients and clinicians in protocol design provides the opportunity to develop research protocols that are meaningful to their target audience and may help overcome some of the inherent threats in conducting RCTs. the majority of protocols do not describe the methodology underpinning their development, limiting the amount of learned experience shared between research groups. Every clinical trial should be underpinned by a rigorously developed protocol [1] there is little published evidence or guidance on the development of randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocols. There are multiple, well-reported pitfalls in conducting RCTs, including: low participant recruitment, differential drop-out across study arms, participants not wishing to be randomised, developing a suitable control intervention, identifying a meaningful change (that is of importance to individuals seeking treatment), and nonadherence to the protocol [4, 5].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call